St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Earnest
296 S.W. 1088, 116 Tex. 565
Opinion
We think the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals (293 S. W. 677) was correct, because the motion filed in the trial court was manifestly insufficient to warrant the vacation of the judgment by default.
We are not prepared to concur in the holdings of the Court of Civil Appeals on the questions of practice discussed in the opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Earnest, 296 S.W. 1088, 116 Tex. 565 (Tex. 1927).
296 S.W. 1088 (St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Earnest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Earnest
293 S.W. 677 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)