St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Miller
This text of 516 So. 2d 1060 (St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find no error in the conclusion that the appellee, a “Big Sister” volunteer who was involved in an accident resulting in the death of her little sister while operating her own vehicle, is an additional insured under the “non-owned auto” provision of a St. Paul liability policy issued to the Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Greater Miami. See Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Heter, 438 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (Hurley, J., concurring). See generally Demshar v. AAA Con Auto Transport, Inc., 337 So.2d 963 (Fla.1976); Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Butler, 314 So.2d 567 (Fla.1975).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
516 So. 2d 1060, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2867, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11598, 1987 WL 2696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-paul-fire-marine-insurance-co-v-miller-fladistctapp-1987.