St. Paul Bar & Restaurant Equipment Co. v. Di Martino

231 N.W.2d 278, 304 Minn. 582, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1476
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 13, 1975·No. No. 45168·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order of. the St. Paul municipal court denying plaintiffs motion for a new trial or amended findings and conclusions of law in an action on an account for supplies furnished by plaintiff to defendants.

The trial court found that the supplies were delivered to the restaurant operated by a corporate entity which has since become defunct and ceased to operate; and that plaintiff, contrary to its contention that defendants were operating the restaurant as a partnership, was doing business with the restaurant as a corporation.

We have examined the record and the authorities submitted and conclude that the findings of the trial court are not clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Paul Bar & Restaurant Equipment Co. v. Di Martino, 231 N.W.2d 278, 304 Minn. 582, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1476 (Mich. 1975).

231 N.W.2d 278 (St. Paul Bar & Restaurant Equipment Co. v. Di Martino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lattimore v. City of Laurel
735 So. 2d 400 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1999)
Kossak v. Stalling
277 N.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1979)