St. Nicholas Syrian Orthodox Church v. Zoning Board

Supreme Court of Connecticut

St. Nicholas Syrian Orthodox Church v. Zoning Board

241 A.2d 879, 156 Conn. 657

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 4, 1968·Published

Opinion

It appearing that the named defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute its appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

Argued June 4 decided June 4, 1968 Aaron A. Levine, for the appellant (named defendant).

The appellant filed a motion for reargument which was denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the named defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute its appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.

Argued June 4 decided June 4, 1968 Aaron A. Levine, for the appellant (named defendant).

The appellant filed a motion for reargument which was denied.

St. Nicholas Syrian Orthodox Church v. Zoning Board, 241 A.2d 879, 156 Conn. 657 (Colo. 1968).

Pincite

241 A.2d 879 (St. Nicholas Syrian Orthodox Church v. Zoning Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.