St. Marys v. Auglaize Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

852 N.E.2d 1213, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1464

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 23, 2006·No. 2006-1033·Published

Opinion

Auglaize App. No. 2-05-17, 2006-Ohio-1773. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and III.

Moyer, C.J., Resnicic and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would also accept on all other Propositions of Law. Pfeifer, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Marys v. Auglaize Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 852 N.E.2d 1213, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1464 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

852 N.E.2d 1213 (St. Marys v. Auglaize Cty. Bd. of Commrs.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.