Home/Ohio Supreme Court/St. Marys v. Auglaize Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

St. Marys v. Auglaize Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

852 N.E.2d 1213, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1464
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 23, 2006
Docket2006-1033
StatusPublished

This text of 852 N.E.2d 1213 (St. Marys v. Auglaize Cty. Bd. of Commrs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Marys v. Auglaize Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 852 N.E.2d 1213, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1464 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

Auglaize App. No. 2-05-17, 2006-Ohio-1773. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and III.

Moyer, C.J., Resnicic and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would also accept on all other Propositions of Law. Pfeifer, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of St. Marys v. Auglaize Bd. Commrs., Unpublished Decision (4-10-2006)
2006 Ohio 1773 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
852 N.E.2d 1213, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-marys-v-auglaize-cty-bd-of-commrs-ohio-2006.