St. Mary Parish Land Co. v. State Mineral Board

Supreme Court of Louisiana

St. Mary Parish Land Co. v. State Mineral Board

168 So. 2d 821, 246 La. 908, 21 Oil & Gas Rep. 614, 1964 La. LEXIS 2802

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 1, 1964

DocketNo. 47518

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 So. 2d 821 (St. Mary Parish Land Co. v. State Mineral Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Mary Parish Land Co. v. State Mineral Board, 168 So. 2d 821, 246 La. 908, 21 Oil & Gas Rep. 614, 1964 La. LEXIS 2802 (La. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: State Mineral Board of the State of Louisiana and Sun Oil Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Mary. 167 So.2d 509.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment except that the order to require the Mineral Board to assert the title of the State goes beyond the needs of the case. However, since the Mineral Board cannot bind the State’s right to assert its title and cannot assert whatever right the State may have without the State’s consent, as the Court of Appeal has recognized, the Mineral Board will sustain no injury other than the cancellation of its mineral lease in the event it fails to comply with the order of the Court of Appeal.

HAWTHORNE, J.,

thinks the writ should be granted on the merits. I cannot agree, moreover, with the decree of this court in refusing the writ. The court has entered an order which in effect amends and changes the decree of the Court of Appeal without giving the parties affected thereby a hearing. Furthermore, the plaintiff itself has not sought a cancellation of the lease in this possessory action.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: State Mineral Board of the State of Louisiana and Sun Oil Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Mary. 167 So.2d 509.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment except that the order to require the Mineral Board to assert the title of the State goes beyond the needs of the case. However, since the Mineral Board cannot bind the State’s right to assert its title and cannot assert whatever right the State may have without the State’s consent, as the Court of Appeal has recognized, the Mineral Board will sustain no injury other than the cancellation of its mineral lease in the event it fails to comply with the order of the Court of Appeal.

HAWTHORNE, J.,

thinks the writ should be granted on the merits. I cannot agree, moreover, with the decree of this court in refusing the writ. The court has entered an order which in effect amends and changes the decree of the Court of Appeal without giving the parties affected thereby a hearing. Furthermore, the plaintiff itself has not sought a cancellation of the lease in this possessory action.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 So. 2d 821, 246 La. 908, 21 Oil & Gas Rep. 614, 1964 La. LEXIS 2802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-mary-parish-land-co-v-state-mineral-board-la-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack