St. Luke's Pentecostal Church, Inc. v. Stewart Title Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

St. Luke's Pentecostal Church, Inc. v. Stewart Title Insurance

37 A.D.3d 702, 828 N.Y.S.2d 907

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 20, 2007·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract pursuant to a policy of title insurance, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau Cohnty (Mahon, J.), dated January 17, 2006, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendant met its prima facie burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by showing that the plaintiffs claim fell within the exclusions of the policy of title insurance (see Logan v Barretto, 251 AD2d 552, 553 [1998]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact.

The plaintiff’s remaining contention is without merit. Schmidt, J.E, Crane, Fisher and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract pursuant to a policy of title insurance, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau Cohnty (Mahon, J.), dated January 17, 2006, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendant met its prima facie burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by showing that the plaintiffs claim fell within the exclusions of the policy of title insurance (see Logan v Barretto, 251 AD2d 552, 553 [1998]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact.

The plaintiff’s remaining contention is without merit. Schmidt, J.E, Crane, Fisher and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

St. Luke's Pentecostal Church, Inc. v. Stewart Title Insurance, 37 A.D.3d 702, 828 N.Y.S.2d 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

37 A.D.3d 702 (St. Luke's Pentecostal Church, Inc. v. Stewart Title Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related