St. Luke's Hospital v. Consolidated Mutual Insurance
This text of 32 Misc. 2d 657 (St. Luke's Hospital v. Consolidated Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where notice of a hospital lien was duly served
on the insurance company in accordance with section 189 of the Lien Law, and the insurer settled the action and made payments to the infant and guardian without the required statutory notice to the hospital, it was liable to the hospital for a period of one year in an action to enforce the lien, to the extent of the money paid to the infant and guardian ad litem in settlement of the claim, less the amount of any other liens or claims superior to such hospital lien (Lien Law, § 189).
The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff, in accordance with stipulation.
Appeal from decision dismissed.
Concur — Hoestadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Misc. 2d 657, 217 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-lukes-hospital-v-consolidated-mutual-insurance-nyappterm-1961.