St. Luke's Hospital Ass'n v. Strollo

15 So. 3d 881, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10485, 2009 WL 2342932
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 2009·No. 1D09-1704·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because we conclude that the outcome of this petition seeking a writ of certiorari is controlled by Amente v. Newman, 653 So.2d 1030 (Fla.1995), which we are constrained to follow, we deny the petition. We note that, at oral argument, counsel for respondents acknowledged that they are willing to bear the cost to have petitioner redact confidential patient information in accordance with the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and the applicable provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations, and that they agree the redacted patient records shall be viewed only by counsel for the parties and their retained experts unless and until the trial court concludes that some or all of those records are properly admissible in evidence at trial.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIO-RARI DENIED.

WOLF, WEBSTER and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Luke's Hospital Ass'n v. Strollo, 15 So. 3d 881, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10485, 2009 WL 2342932 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

15 So. 3d 881 (St. Luke's Hospital Ass'n v. Strollo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amente v. Newman
653 So. 2d 1030 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)