St. Luke's Hospital Ass'n v. Strollo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

St. Luke's Hospital Ass'n v. Strollo

15 So. 3d 881, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10485, 2009 WL 2342932

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 31, 2009

Docket1D09-1704

StatusPublished

This text of 15 So. 3d 881 (St. Luke's Hospital Ass'n v. Strollo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Luke's Hospital Ass'n v. Strollo, 15 So. 3d 881, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10485, 2009 WL 2342932 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because we conclude that the outcome of this petition seeking a writ of certiorari is controlled by Amente v. Newman, 653 So.2d 1030 (Fla.1995), which we are constrained to follow, we deny the petition. We note that, at oral argument, counsel for respondents acknowledged that they are willing to bear the cost to have petitioner redact confidential patient information in accordance with the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and the applicable provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations, and that they agree the redacted patient records shall be viewed only by counsel for the parties and their retained experts unless and until the trial court concludes that some or all of those records are properly admissible in evidence at trial.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIO-RARI DENIED.

WOLF, WEBSTER and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because we conclude that the outcome of this petition seeking a writ of certiorari is controlled by Amente v. Newman, 653 So.2d 1030 (Fla.1995), which we are constrained to follow, we deny the petition. We note that, at oral argument, counsel for respondents acknowledged that they are willing to bear the cost to have petitioner redact confidential patient information in accordance with the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and the applicable provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations, and that they agree the redacted patient records shall be viewed only by counsel for the parties and their retained experts unless and until the trial court concludes that some or all of those records are properly admissible in evidence at trial.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIO-RARI DENIED.

WOLF, WEBSTER and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 So. 3d 881, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10485, 2009 WL 2342932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-lukes-hospital-assn-v-strollo-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack