ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL v. Marks

193 S.W.3d 575, 49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 609, 2006 Tex. LEXIS 438, 2006 WL 1195464
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedMay 5, 2006
Docket05-0693
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 193 S.W.3d 575 (ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL v. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL v. Marks, 193 S.W.3d 575, 49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 609, 2006 Tex. LEXIS 438, 2006 WL 1195464 (Tex. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for review is granted. Without reference to the merits, the court of appeals’ judgment, 177 S.W.3d 255, is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of our decision in Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. Rubio, 185 S.W.3d 842 (Tex.2005). See TEX. R. APP. P. 59.1, 60.2(f).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
319 S.W.3d 658 (Texas Supreme Court, 2010)
Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
229 S.W.3d 396 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 S.W.3d 575, 49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 609, 2006 Tex. LEXIS 438, 2006 WL 1195464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-lukes-episcopal-hospital-v-marks-tex-2006.