ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL v. Marks

193 S.W.3d 575, 49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 609, 2006 Tex. LEXIS 438, 2006 WL 1195464
Texas Supreme Court·Decided May 5, 2006·No. 05-0693·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for review is granted. Without reference to the merits, the court of appeals’ judgment, 177 S.W.3d 255, is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of our decision in Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. Rubio, 185 S.W.3d 842 (Tex.2005). See TEX. R. APP. P. 59.1, 60.2(f).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL v. Marks, 193 S.W.3d 575, 49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 609, 2006 Tex. LEXIS 438, 2006 WL 1195464 (Tex. 2006).

193 S.W.3d 575 (ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL v. Marks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
319 S.W.3d 658 (Texas Supreme Court, 2010)
Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
229 S.W.3d 396 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)