ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL v. Marks
193 S.W.3d 575, 49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 609, 2006 Tex. LEXIS 438, 2006 WL 1195464
Opinion
The petition for review is granted. Without reference to the merits, the court of appeals’ judgment, 177 S.W.3d 255, is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of our decision in Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. Rubio, 185 S.W.3d 842 (Tex.2005). See TEX. R. APP. P. 59.1, 60.2(f).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL v. Marks, 193 S.W.3d 575, 49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 609, 2006 Tex. LEXIS 438, 2006 WL 1195464 (Tex. 2006).
193 S.W.3d 575 (ST. LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL v. Marks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
319 S.W.3d 658 (Texas Supreme Court, 2010)
Irving W. Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
Texas Supreme Court, 2009
Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
229 S.W.3d 396 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Irving W. Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007