St. Louis, Vandalia & T. H. R. R. v. Town of Vandalia

103 Ill. App. 363, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 145
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedApril 26, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 103 Ill. App. 363 (St. Louis, Vandalia & T. H. R. R. v. Town of Vandalia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Louis, Vandalia & T. H. R. R. v. Town of Vandalia, 103 Ill. App. 363, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 145 (Ill. Ct. App. 1902).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from in this case was entered by the Circuit Court of Bond County, in a chancery case therein pending, instituted by appellees, minority stockholders of appellant corporation, against appellant corporation and certain of its officers, directors and stockholders. Ho final decree has been entered in the case; but upon the coming in of the answers of the various defendants to the bill of complaint, and the producing of evidence fro and con as to certain issues raised in the pleadings, the court entered the following interlocutory order:

“ First. That Henry C. Begole be appointed receiver in this cause of all and singular, the money, credits, rights, choses in action, records, books, papers and property of the St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Eailroad Company (except its railroad and the equipment thereof), no matter where or in whose possession they or any of them may be.
Second. That said receiver be authorized and directed to collect, receive and reduce to possession all the said moneys, credits, choses in action, records, books, papers and property of said company above named, with the said exception, and to give proper receipts and acquittances for the same.
Third. That said receiver be authorized and directed to commence and prosecute in any and all proper jurisdictions, any suit or suits, action or actions, in his own name as such receiver, or in the name of the St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Eailroad Company, which he may be advised are necessary to recover any sum or sums of money which the said company, through its officers, directors or stockholders has paid out or allowed to be retained by any person or corporation as compensation for any equipments or betterments put upon the railroad of said company since the 1st day of July, A. D. 1870, or to recover any and all sum or sums of money which said company has, through any of the agencies aforesaid, paid out, or allowed to be retained by any person or corporation as dividends upon any stock of said company designated and known as preferred stock.
Fourth. And the said receiver is authorized and directed to bring any suit or suits, action or actions, in any and all proper jurisdictions, in his own name as such receiver, or in the name of said company, which he may be advised are necessary and proper to cancel any bonded indebtedness of said company, or any part thereof, by causing to be set off against the same any or all of said dividends, if the said dividends have been received by any owner or holder of said bonded debt, and to take all steps and to do all things which he may be advised are necessary or proper to restore to said company all the money due it from any source whatever, or to get a proper credit for the same upon its bonded debt.
Fifth. And the said receiver is authorized, if he be so advised, to bring, in his own name as such receiver, or in the name of the said St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Eailroad Company, or in the name of any stockholder thereof who may consent to the • same, any suit or suits, action or actions, which may be necessary to cancel any stock of said company, known and designated on its records as preferred stock, or to set aside and annul all and any preference or advantage which any stock of said company may have over any other stock thereof.
Sixth. And the said receiver is hereby authorized and directed to collect and receipt for all rentals due or to become due said company under and by virtue of the terms of the existing lease of its railroad to the Terre Haute and Indianapolis Eailroad Company; and in his own name as such receiver, or in that of the St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Eailroad Company, to commence and prosecute such suit or suits, action or actions, proceeding or proceedings, in any proper jurisdiction or court, as he may be advised are necessary to collect such rentals, or to forfeit such lease in case of their non-payment—and in case said lease is declared forfeited by the order, judgment or decree of any court, or the property in the said lease described is surrendered to said receiver, he shall operate the same by such servants, employes and agents as he shall deem necessary, until the further order of this court in the premises; and ñe shall apply to this court, at its first regular term after such forfeiture or surrender, for its further orders and directions in that behalf.
Seventh. And the said receiver is hereby empowered to employ any attorney or attorneys, agent or agents, solicitor or solicitors, which he may deem necessary, in order to enable him to execute this decree; and, subject to the orders of this court, to pay them out of any fund's in his hands as such receiver, a reasonable compensation for any services they may render under their employment, and to pay out of said funds all the costs and necessary expenses, exclusive of counsel fees of any and all suits, actions or proceedings which he may bring or commence, or cause to be brought or commenced, under or by authority of this decree, and all the costs and charges of executing this decree; and the said receiver shall, on or before the second day of every term of this court, until his discharge or removal, render an itemized account of his receipts and expenditures as such receiver, and render to this court in writing a statement of all property in his hands as such receiver, and a report of the true condition of all matters and things hereby committed to his charge; and he shall keep correct books of account, which shall show all of his receipts and expenditures of money coming into his hands as such receiver, which books shall be subject at all reasonable times to the inspection of any party to^ this suit, or his or its agents thereunto authorized in writing.
Eighth. And the said receiver, when he has obtained possession of the books and papers of said company, shall bring them into the State of Illinois and keep them at its general office in the City of Greenville, in said State, subject to the inspection of any stockholder of said company, and subject to any proper use of the same which the directors and officers of said company may see fit to make at said office.
Ninth. And the said receiver shall, before entering upon the duties of his trust, as prescribed by this decree, enter into a bond in the penal sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) with the parties to this suit as obligees, with good and sufficient sureties to be approved by the clerk of this court, and conditioned to the effect that if he, the said Henry G. Begole, as such receiver, shall faithfully account for and pay over all money and deliver all other property which may come into his hands as such receiver, as ordered and directed by this court, and shall faithfully comply with the orders and decrees of this court made and entered, or to be made and entered in this cause, then the obligation of said bond to be void; and when said bond is approved by the said clerk and filed in his office, the said receiver shall enter upon the duties of his said trust.
Tenth. .It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed by the court that any party to this suit who has in his possession or in his charge, or under his control, any money, books, papers, or other propertjr of the said St.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hurst v. Papierz
306 N.E.2d 532 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1973)
Ellis v. Penn Beef Co.
80 A. 666 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1911)
St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute R. R. v. Town of Vandalia
109 Ill. App. 498 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 Ill. App. 363, 1902 Ill. App. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-vandalia-t-h-r-r-v-town-of-vandalia-illappct-1902.