St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Newcomb.

Court of Appeals of Texas

St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Newcomb.

146 S.W. 1196, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 409

DecidedApril 25, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 146 S.W. 1196 (St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Newcomb.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Newcomb., 146 S.W. 1196, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 409 (Tex. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

WILLSON, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). We think the trial court erred when he allowed appellee’s claim and directed payment thereof to be made out of funds of the receivership. It appeared that L. E. Walker undertook and was paid out of said funds to maintain the office of the railway company in Marshall. Appellee should have looked to him for compensation for assistance she rendered in the performance by him of that undertaking.

The judgment wul be reversed, and a judgment will be here rendered that appellee take nothing by her intervention.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILLSON, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). We think the trial court erred when he allowed appellee’s claim and directed payment thereof to be made out of funds of the receivership. It appeared that L. E. Walker undertook and was paid out of said funds to maintain the office of the railway company in Marshall. Appellee should have looked to him for compensation for assistance she rendered in the performance by him of that undertaking.

The judgment wul be reversed, and a judgment will be here rendered that appellee take nothing by her intervention.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 S.W. 1196, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-union-trust-co-v-newcomb-texapp-1912.