St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Newcomb.

Court of Appeals of Texas

St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Newcomb.

146 S.W. 1196, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 409

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 25, 1912·Published

Opinion

WILLSON, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). We think the trial court erred when he allowed appellee’s claim and directed payment thereof to be made out of funds of the receivership. It appeared that L. E. Walker undertook and was paid out of said funds to maintain the office of the railway company in Marshall. Appellee should have looked to him for compensation for assistance she rendered in the performance by him of that undertaking.

The judgment wul be reversed, and a judgment will be here rendered that appellee take nothing by her intervention.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILLSON, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). We think the trial court erred when he allowed appellee’s claim and directed payment thereof to be made out of funds of the receivership. It appeared that L. E. Walker undertook and was paid out of said funds to maintain the office of the railway company in Marshall. Appellee should have looked to him for compensation for assistance she rendered in the performance by him of that undertaking.

The judgment wul be reversed, and a judgment will be here rendered that appellee take nothing by her intervention.

St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Newcomb., 146 S.W. 1196, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 409 (Tex. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

146 S.W. 1196 (St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Newcomb.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.