St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Richards

Court of Appeals of Texas

St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Richards

217 S.W. 1116, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 1313

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 2, 1919

DocketNo. 2174.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 217 S.W. 1116 (St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Richards, 217 S.W. 1116, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 1313 (Tex. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

LEVY, J.

This action is by appellee to recover damages for alleged negligence in the transportation of 442 head of cattle from Ft. Worth to Mt. Vernon, Tex. The negligence alleged is that of rough handling of the'cattle en route. The defendant answered by denial .and plea of contributory hegligenee. The case was tried before a jury and a verdict returned in favor of the .plaintiff for $3,000. There is involved in the verdict a finding of negligence, as alleged, proximately causing injury to the cattle, and that finding of fact has support in the evidence and, is here, sustained, ....

Appellant’s assignments of error Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 did not, we .think, .warrant a reversal. of the judgment. But the fifth assignment of error, complaining of the amount of. the verdict as excessive, should, we conclude,' be sustained. In view of the record, it is thought that the jury were authorized to,assess as damages the sum of $1,250.

The judgment therefore will be reversed and the cause remanded, unless the appellee files in this court within 15 days a remittitur of the sum of $1,750; in which event the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEVY, J.

This action is by appellee to recover damages for alleged negligence in the transportation of 442 head of cattle from Ft. Worth to Mt. Vernon, Tex. The negligence alleged is that of rough handling of the'cattle en route. The defendant answered by denial .and plea of contributory hegligenee. The case was tried before a jury and a verdict returned in favor of the .plaintiff for $3,000. There is involved in the verdict a finding of negligence, as alleged, proximately causing injury to the cattle, and that finding of fact has support in the evidence and, is here, sustained, ....

Appellant’s assignments of error Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 did not, we .think, .warrant a reversal. of the judgment. But the fifth assignment of error, complaining of the amount of. the verdict as excessive, should, we conclude,' be sustained. In view of the record, it is thought that the jury were authorized to,assess as damages the sum of $1,250.

The judgment therefore will be reversed and the cause remanded, unless the appellee files in this court within 15 days a remittitur of the sum of $1,750; in which event the judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 S.W. 1116, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 1313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-southwestern-ry-co-of-texas-v-richards-texapp-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack