St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. Ray
This text of 104 U.S. 657 (St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
104 U.S. 657
26 L.Ed. 882
St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co.
v.
RAY
October Term, 1881
NOTE.—Smelting Company v. Ray, error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado, was argued at the same time as the preceding case, and by the same counsel for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Thomas M. Patterson for the defendants in error.
MR. JUSTICE FIELD remarked that, as it presented the same questions there determined, the judgment of the court below must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
MR. JUSTICE MILLER and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 U.S. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-smelting-refining-co-v-ray-scotus-1882.