St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. Ray

104 U.S. 657
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 18, 1882·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

104 U.S. 657

104 U.S. 657

26 L.Ed. 882

St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co.
v.
RAY

October Term, 1881

NOTE.—Smelting Company v. Ray, error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado, was argued at the same time as the preceding case, and by the same counsel for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Thomas M. Patterson for the defendants in error.

MR. JUSTICE FIELD remarked that, as it presented the same questions there determined, the judgment of the court below must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

MR. JUSTICE MILLER and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. Ray, 104 U.S. 657 (1882).

104 U.S. 657 (St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. Ray
21 F. Cas. 207 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado, 1879)