St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pontotoc County Excise Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pontotoc County Excise Board

47 P.2d 177, 172 Okla. 607

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 18, 1935

DocketNo. 25493.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 47 P.2d 177 (St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pontotoc County Excise Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pontotoc County Excise Board, 47 P.2d 177, 172 Okla. 607 (Okla. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

WELCH, J.

The sole question here in *608 volved has been determined by the court in Morley v. State ex rel. Board of Education, City of Tulsa, 171 Okla. 46, 47 P. (2d) 170, where it was held in paragraph 1 of the syllabus that:

“Under the provisions of chapter 85, Session Laws 1933, a surplus balance and net unincumbered ad valorem taxes in the process of collection within legal limitations, are available for appropriation in addition to the amount that may be raised by ad valorem taxation.”

See, also, Protest of St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 169 Okla. 64, 38 P. (2d) 513, to the same effect.

The judgment is affirmed.

McNEILL, O. J., and BUSBY, PHELPS, and CORN, JX, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI