St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pitts

1926 OK 367, 266 P. 767, 114 Okla. 227, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 997
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided April 13, 1926·No. 16815·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon authority of Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469, 106 Pac. 957, this cause is reversed and remanded for a new trial for failure of the defendants in error to file a brief as required by rule 7 of this court. Brief of the plaintiff in error was served and filed December 5, 1925.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pitts, 1926 OK 367, 266 P. 767, 114 Okla. 227, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 997 (Okla. 1926).

1926 OK 367 (St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pitts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ellis v. Outler
1910 OK 9 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)