St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Sidberry

406 So. 2d 82, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21806
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 23, 1981·No. No. ZZ-42·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company (Frisco) appeals a judgment following a jury trial for damages incurred in an automobile-locomotive collision. The collision occurred at an unmarked grade crossing. Frisco raises four issues, three of which we find to be without merit.

However, we agree with appellant that § 627.7372(1), Florida Statutes (1977)1 requires a jury instruction directing a reduction in the damage award by the amount received from the collateral source.2 See Purdy v. Gulf Breeze Enterprises, Inc., 403 So.2d 1325 (Fla.1981), rehearing denied October 19, 1981; McKee v. City of Jacksonville, 395 So.2d 222 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). A remittitur equal to the amount received from the collateral source is an appropriate remedy, avoiding the need for a trial on the issue of damages.

The judgment is AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED with instructions to enter a remittitur in accordance with this opinion.

BOOTH, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Sidberry, 406 So. 2d 82, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21806 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

406 So. 2d 82 (St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Sidberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miami Nat. Bank v. Nunez
541 So. 2d 1259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Silber v. Cn'R IND. OF JACKSONVILLE
526 So. 2d 974 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Schaefer
421 So. 2d 48 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)