St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Sidberry
Opinion
The St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company (Frisco) appeals a judgment following a jury trial for damages incurred in an automobile-locomotive collision. The collision occurred at an unmarked grade crossing. Frisco raises four issues, three of which we find to be without merit.
However, we agree with appellant that § 627.7372(1), Florida Statutes (1977)1 requires a jury instruction directing a reduction in the damage award by the amount received from the collateral source.2 See Purdy v. Gulf Breeze Enterprises, Inc., 403 So.2d 1325 (Fla.1981), rehearing denied October 19, 1981; McKee v. City of Jacksonville, 395 So.2d 222 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). A remittitur equal to the amount received from the collateral source is an appropriate remedy, avoiding the need for a trial on the issue of damages.
The judgment is AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED with instructions to enter a remittitur in accordance with this opinion.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
406 So. 2d 82 (St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Sidberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.