St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Sidberry
This text of 406 So. 2d 82 (St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Sidberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company (Frisco) appeals a judgment following a jury trial for damages incurred in an automobile-locomotive collision. The collision occurred at an unmarked grade crossing. Frisco raises four issues, three of which we find to be without merit.
However, we agree with appellant that § 627.7372(1), Florida Statutes (1977)1 requires a jury instruction directing a reduction in the damage award by the amount received from the collateral source.2 See Purdy v. Gulf Breeze Enterprises, Inc., 403 So.2d 1325 (Fla.1981), rehearing denied October 19, 1981; McKee v. City of Jacksonville, 395 So.2d 222 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). A remittitur equal to the amount received from the collateral source is an appropriate remedy, avoiding the need for a trial on the issue of damages.
The judgment is AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED with instructions to enter a remittitur in accordance with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
406 So. 2d 82, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-san-francisco-railway-co-v-sidberry-fladistctapp-1981.