St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Shoemaker

38 Kan. 723
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 38 Kan. 723 (St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Shoemaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Shoemaker, 38 Kan. 723 (kan 1888).

Opinion

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

This case was tried by a jury upon the first two causes of action stated in the petition, and resulted in a verdict for the defendant in error, for $48.78. The jury returned answers to particular questions submitted to them, and among other things found that the railroad was constructed through the land of the defendant in error by a contractor, at a stipulated price, who had sole control of the [726]*726employment and discharge of his own hands and servants, and that they went outside of the right-of-way and dug and removed earth, stone, and gravel. They also found that the plaintiff in error, the railway company, employed hands and servants in the construction of said railroad; but they also found that such agents and servants of the railway company did not advise, aid or abet the person engaged in the construction of the road to go outside of the right-of-way and dig and remove stone, earth and gravel from the land of the defendant in error.

These special findings are so inconsistent with each other, and are so antagonistic to the general verdict, that the case must be reversed for the same reasons given in Shoemaker v. St. L. & S. F. Rly. Co., 30 Kas. 359.

It is recommended that the judgment be reversed, with instructions to grant a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tacha v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
155 P. 922 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1916)
Mann v. Northeast Kansas Telephone Co.
111 P. 181 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1910)
Stanard v. Sampson Et Ux.
1909 OK 13 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Kan. 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-san-francisco-railway-co-v-shoemaker-kan-1888.