St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. City of Pleasanton

257 P. 982, 124 Kan. 243, 1927 Kan. LEXIS 214

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

In this case, as reported in 121 Kan. 559, 560, 247 Pac. 447, 448, an erroneous citation was given. The sentence as printed reads:

“The proceeding in this case was under R. S. 12-607, et seq., which do not require such a resolution.” (p. 560.)

The citation to the statute was an error; it should have been R. S. 12-617. The error is hereby corrected, on the court’s own motion.