St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. State
This text of 1909 OK 244 (St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellees, through their attorney, move to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the court has not jurisdiction thereof. The only authority that this court has to entertain an appeal from the Corporation Commission is by virtue of section 20, art. 9 (section 231, Bunn’s Ed.) of the Constitution, which provides that:
“From any action of the commission prescribing rates, charges, or classifications of traffic, or affecting the train schedule of any transporation company, or requiring additional facilities, conveniences, or public service of any transportation or transmission company, or refusing to approve a suspending bond, or requiring ladditional security thereon or an increase thereof, as hereinafter provided for, an appeal (subject to such reasonable limitations as to time, regulations as to procedure and provision as to cost, as may be prescribed by law) may be talren by the corporation whose rates, charges or classifications of traffic, schedule, facilities, conveniences, or service, are affected, or by any person deeming himself aggrieved by such action or (if allowed by law) by the state.”
This appeal does not come within the terms of the foregoing, and the same is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1909 OK 244, 105 P. 351, 24 Okla. 805, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-s-f-ry-co-v-state-okla-1909.