St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McLelland

62 F. 118, 10 C.C.A. 302, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2280
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 21, 1894·No. No. 292·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THAYER, District Judge.

This is a second writ of error which was sued out in this case, after a first writ of error had been granted to obtain a reversal of the judgment for errors committed at the trial. The present writ was sued out to correct alleged errors of the trial court in the taxation of costs after the rendition of judgment. As we have already reversed the judgment in this case, on which the liability to pay the disputed costs depends (62 Fed. 116), and as there was no apparent necessity for suing out the second writ, inasmuch as all of the assigned errors might have been incorporated in one and the same record, the second writ of error should be dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McLelland, 62 F. 118, 10 C.C.A. 302, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2280 (8th Cir. 1894).

62 F. 118 (St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McLelland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Central National Bank v. Willis
8 Tenn. App. 204 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1928)