St. Louis & S. F. R. v. Bowles

64 So. 968, 107 Miss. 97
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1914·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Coon, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

"We are asked to reverse this case because the verdict of the jury is contrary to the overwhelming preponderance of the evidence. A careful review of the evidence-fails to convince us that the weight of credible evidence rests with, appellant, and, besides, we do not believe it to be the province of this court to set aside the verdict of' a jury, finding the facts of the case, merely because we should be of opinion that the verdict was contrary to what we deemed the weight of evidence. In the instant case it is not difficult to find ample reasons for the jury’s refusal to believe the testimony offered on behalf of appellant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis & S. F. R. v. Bowles, 64 So. 968, 107 Miss. 97 (Mich. 1914).

64 So. 968 (St. Louis & S. F. R. v. Bowles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SCHUMPERT v. Watson
129 So. 2d 627 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1961)
Alley v. Thompson
185 S.W.2d 910 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1944)