St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Whale

1910 OK 93, 108 P. 403, 25 Okla. 852, 1910 Okla. LEXIS 347
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 8, 1910
Docket463
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1910 OK 93 (St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Whale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Whale, 1910 OK 93, 108 P. 403, 25 Okla. 852, 1910 Okla. LEXIS 347 (Okla. 1910).

Opinion

Dunn, C. J.

-Counsel for both parties in the above-entitled cause have agreed that the judgment rendered therein is supported by the same evidence as that in the case of St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company v. Shannon (reported in this volume) 108 Pac. 401; the only difference in the two cases being that in the instant ease the cause of action is for hay which was destroyed at the time the barn was burned for which the action above referred to was brought, and it is stipulated that the decision in this case shall follow the decision in the Shannon Case.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Midland Valley R. Co. v. Barton
1942 OK 342 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1910 OK 93, 108 P. 403, 25 Okla. 852, 1910 Okla. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-s-f-r-co-v-whale-okla-1910.