St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Southern Fuel Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Southern Fuel Co.

1916 OK 346, 157 P. 321, 59 Okla. 22, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1079

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 21, 1916

Docket6869

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK 346 (St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Southern Fuel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Southern Fuel Co., 1916 OK 346, 157 P. 321, 59 Okla. 22, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1079 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

WILSON. C.

This case comes to this court on appeal from the district court of Oklahoma county and was filed on October 1.1914. Plaintiff in error’s brief was duly served and filed on December 18, 1915. Although the cause has been duly submitted by order of the court, defendant in error lias failed to file its answer brief within the time allowed by the rules of the court, and no reason has been given for such failure.

We have examined plaintiff in error's brief, and it reasonably well sustains the assignments of error set out in its petition in error, and we, therefore, without searching the record to find some reason why the judgment appealed from should be sustained, recommend that it be reversed and remanded to the distript court of Oklahoma county, with directions that a new trial be granted.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

WILSON. C.

This case comes to this court on appeal from the district court of Oklahoma county and was filed on October 1.1914. Plaintiff in error’s brief was duly served and filed on December 18, 1915. Although the cause has been duly submitted by order of the court, defendant in error lias failed to file its answer brief within the time allowed by the rules of the court, and no reason has been given for such failure.

We have examined plaintiff in error's brief, and it reasonably well sustains the assignments of error set out in its petition in error, and we, therefore, without searching the record to find some reason why the judgment appealed from should be sustained, recommend that it be reversed and remanded to the distript court of Oklahoma county, with directions that a new trial be granted.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK 346, 157 P. 321, 59 Okla. 22, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-s-f-r-co-v-southern-fuel-co-okla-1916.