St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Haworth

1915 OK 428, 149 P. 1086, 48 Okla. 132, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 598
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 8, 1915·No. 4253·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Opinion' by

THACKER, C.

This is an action by plaintiff in error, as plaintiff in the trial court, against defendants in error, treasurer and sheriff, respectively, of Canadian' county, as defendants in the trial court, to enjoin the collection of a tax levy of $56.08 for Mustang *133 township, and $63 for school district No. 49, in said county, the same being clearly and far in excess of the amounts required by the estimates made for that year, that is, the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1909, and ending June 30, 1910, which required amounts were duly paid by the plaintiff. A temporary injunction was granted, but, upon the trial of the case, the court denied plaintiff’s prayer for a permanent injunction and dissolved the said temporary injunction.

The defendants in error have, without offer of excuse thérefor, failed to file any brief; and plaintiff’s brief, in which the case of St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Tate, 35 Okla. 563, 130 Pac. 941, is cited and quoted as supporting its demand of relief, at least reasonably tends to sustain its assignment of error in the aforesaid action of the trial court. Also see St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Thompson, 35 Okla. 138, 128 Pac. 685, and Same v. Amend et al., 44 Okla. 602, 145 Pac. 1117.

For the reasons stated, the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and remanded, with instructions to enter judgment permanently enjoining the collection of said sums, aggregating $119.08.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Haworth, 1915 OK 428, 149 P. 1086, 48 Okla. 132, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 598 (Okla. 1915).

1915 OK 428 (St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Haworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Tillman County Excise Board
1949 OK 174 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1949)
Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County Excise Bd.
1943 OK 182 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1943)
Grubb v. Smiley
1929 OK 534 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Aaronson v. Smiley
1929 OK 522 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Seay v. Hawkins
17 F.2d 710 (Eighth Circuit, 1927)
Bristow Battery Co. v. Payne
1926 OK 627 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)
Ryan v. Bass Furniture Co.
1925 OK 609 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Forbes
1925 OK 542 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Taylor
1922 OK 107 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1922)
McGee v. School Dist. No. 196
1921 OK 102 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1921)
State Ex Rel. Davis v. Beatty
1919 OK 374 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1919)
Lusk v. Ryan
1918 OK 94 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Weaver
1918 OK 71 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Lowrance
1918 OK 11 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
Butte v. Routh
1917 OK 613 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
Rogers v. Bass & Harbour Co.
1917 OK 482 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
City of Collinsville v. Ward
1917 OK 151 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)