St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Harkey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Harkey

1916 OK 671, 158 P. 438, 59 Okla. 158, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1159

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 13, 1916

Docket6582

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK 671 (St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Harkey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Harkey, 1916 OK 671, 158 P. 438, 59 Okla. 158, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1159 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

Plaintiff in error duly perfected its appeal from the court below and duly filed and served its brief in this court in compliance with the rules, but the defendant in error has failed to file brief and offers no excuse for such failure. The brief of plaintiff in error and the authorities therein cited seem to sustain the assignments of error therein taken. In such case this court will not search the record for reasons to sustain the judgment of the court below, but will reverfee- and remand the cause.

*159 The judgment of tin* court below should therefore lie reversed, and the cause remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

Plaintiff in error duly perfected its appeal from the court below and duly filed and served its brief in this court in compliance with the rules, but the defendant in error has failed to file brief and offers no excuse for such failure. The brief of plaintiff in error and the authorities therein cited seem to sustain the assignments of error therein taken. In such case this court will not search the record for reasons to sustain the judgment of the court below, but will reverfee- and remand the cause.

*159 The judgment of tin* court below should therefore lie reversed, and the cause remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK 671, 158 P. 438, 59 Okla. 158, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-s-f-r-co-v-harkey-okla-1916.