St. Louis Rams Partnership v. Gaddis G.P., L.L.C.

275 S.W.3d 292, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1393, 2008 WL 4554222
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 14, 2008·No. ED 90761·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vern Stisser appeals the trial court’s denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment entered in favor of The Gaddis G.P., L.L.C., et al. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties *293 have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis Rams Partnership v. Gaddis G.P., L.L.C., 275 S.W.3d 292, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1393, 2008 WL 4554222 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

275 S.W.3d 292 (St. Louis Rams Partnership v. Gaddis G.P., L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.