St. Louis Merchants' Bridge Terminal Railway Co. v. Callahan

194 U.S. 628, 24 S. Ct. 857, 48 L. Ed. 1157, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 654
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 18, 1904
DocketNo. 203
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 194 U.S. 628 (St. Louis Merchants' Bridge Terminal Railway Co. v. Callahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Louis Merchants' Bridge Terminal Railway Co. v. Callahan, 194 U.S. 628, 24 S. Ct. 857, 48 L. Ed. 1157, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 654 (1904).

Opinion

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. Argued and submitted April 11, 1904. Decided April 18, 1904. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Tullis v. Railroad Company, 175 U. S. 348, 351, and cases cited. Reported in state court, 170 Missouri, 473. Mr. Robert A. Holland, Jr., Mr. J. E. McKeighan and Mr. M. F. Watts for plaintiff in error. Mr. William F. Woerner for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Austin v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
220 F. 85 (Eighth Circuit, 1915)
Sonsmith v. Pere Marquette Railroad
138 N.W. 347 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)
Kreps v. Brady
1912 OK 495 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Ferguson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
135 N.W. 268 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Melton
218 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Watson v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.
169 F. 942 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas, 1909)
Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Melton
105 S.W. 366 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 U.S. 628, 24 S. Ct. 857, 48 L. Ed. 1157, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-merchants-bridge-terminal-railway-co-v-callahan-scotus-1904.