St. Louis, Kennett & Southeastern Railroad v. United States

58 Ct. Cl. 339, 1923 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 325
United States Court of Claims·Decided April 30, 1923·No. No. B-234·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[340] MEMORANDUM

BV THE COURT.

The court’s conclusion is based upon the considerations:

(1) That the jurisdiction of the Court of Claims in cases such as this is conferred by section 3 of the Federal control [341] act, 40 Stat. 451. It provides for action by a board of referees and authorizes an agreement by the President with the carrier, and “ failing such agreement ” suit may be brought to determine the amount of just compensation. In the suit thus authorized the report of the referees is prima, facie evidence of the amount of compensation and of the facts stated therein. The facts averred in the petition fail to show that the condition precedent contemplated by the statute has been complied with so as to bring the case within the jurisdiction of this court.

(2) That if the court have jurisdiction the agreement, Exhibit A to the petition, concludes any rights the plaintiff might otherwise have.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis, Kennett & Southeastern Railroad v. United States, 58 Ct. Cl. 339, 1923 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 325 (cc 1923).

58 Ct. Cl. 339 (St. Louis, Kennett & Southeastern Railroad v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Missouri Southern Railroad v. United States
65 Ct. Cl. 136 (Court of Claims, 1928)