St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Stephens

78 S.W. 766, 72 Ark. 127, 1904 Ark. LEXIS 99
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 9, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 78 S.W. 766 (St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Stephens, 78 S.W. 766, 72 Ark. 127, 1904 Ark. LEXIS 99 (Ark. 1904).

Opinion

Riddick, J.

(after stating the facts). It is conceded that the-evidence in this case is sufficient to sustain the judgment, but the-defendant contends that the action is barred by the statute of limitations, and this is so if the statute commenced to run at the time the road was constructed. Now, the evidence shows that the-creeks and drains which plaintiff claims were obstructed by the construction of the railroad were not completely closed thereby. Openings were left, which afterwards proved to be insufficient, but this was not known at the time the road was constructed. Whether or not they would prove to be so was uncertain, so that it could not be known at that time that the construction of the road in that way was necessarily injurious to the land of plaintiff. In this respect the case is different from the cases of St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Anderson, 62 Ark. 360, and St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Morris, 35 Ark. 622; and the statute of limitations on the plaintiff’s right of action for injury to the crop growing on her land did not commence to run until the injury happened. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Biggs, 52 Ark. 240; Railway Co. v. Yarbrough, 56 Ark. 612.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson, Trustee v. McGuire
169 S.W.2d 872 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1943)
Daniels v. Batesville
76 S.W.2d 309 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1934)
Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Hadley
1934 OK 336 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Humphreys
155 S.W. 127 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1913)
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Davis
1910 OK 124 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)
Turner v. Overton
111 S.W. 270 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1908)
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Hoshall
102 S.W. 207 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1907)
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. McCutchen
96 S.W. 1054 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1906)
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Morris
89 S.W. 846 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 S.W. 766, 72 Ark. 127, 1904 Ark. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-iron-mountain-southern-railway-co-v-stephens-ark-1904.