St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Schneider

30 Mo. App. 620, 1888 Mo. App. LEXIS 321
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 24, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 30 Mo. App. 620 (St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Schneider, 30 Mo. App. 620, 1888 Mo. App. LEXIS 321 (Mo. Ct. App. 1888).

Opinions

Rombauer, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff, anterior to the date of the grievance .herein complained of, had constructed a railroad bank running southwardly for a distance of twenty-five miles :u.nd more in the valley of the Whitewater. The Whitewater is a stream of perpetual flow, draining a large . .area of country, and is about two hundred feet wide. At a certain point in its course a slough or bayou runs ,,out of it eastwardly nearly at right angles, which slough, at its junction with the Whitewater, has a width • of about one hundred and fifty feet, and a well-defined channel and banks for a distance of from four hundred to six hundred feet, and no more. This slough or bayou is known as the Thumb. The Thumb is not shown to be fed by any living springs, but in high water- the . waters of the Whitewater find a partial outlet through it, running through its defined channel for the distance above stated, and then spreading out through the timber and over the surrounding country without any defined .■channel. Across the Thumb and about one hundred and fifty feet from the eastern bank of the Whitewater, the plaintiff had on the line of its railroad constructed .ja truss bridge, resting on abutments. Thereafter, in the year 1886, part of defendants, who are county judges . of Cape Girardeau, contracted on behalf of the county with the other defendants, to erect as part of a county road a solid embankment across the Thumb at the 'point -.of its junction with the Whitewater, The defendant -contractors entered upon the performance of this work [623]*623and had nearly completed it when the plaintiff sued out a writ of injunction in this proceeding.

[0]*0

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prichard v. Hink
574 S.W.2d 30 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)
Jones v. Des Moines & Mississippi River Levee District No. 1
369 S.W.2d 865 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1963)
Happy v. Kenton
247 S.W.2d 698 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1952)
Johnson v. Gray's Point Terminal Railway Co.
85 S.W. 941 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Applegate v. Franklin
84 S.W. 347 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1904)
Hagge v. Kansas City S. Ry. Co.
104 F. 391 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri, 1900)
Gray v. Schriber
58 Mo. App. 173 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Mo. App. 620, 1888 Mo. App. LEXIS 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-iron-mountain-southern-railway-co-v-schneider-moctapp-1888.