St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Rapp
39 Ark. 558
Opinion
OPINION.
The bill of exceptions not having been presented to and signed by the judge until after the expiration of the time given therefor in the order of the court* it is no part of the record. Garabaldi v. Carroll, 33 Ark., 568; and see Nye v. Old Colony Railroad Co., 124 Mass., 241; Cooney v. Burt, 123 Mass., 579; Walker v. Woolen, 54 Ind., 164; Moffett v. Pollard, 19 Ind., 178.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Rapp, 39 Ark. 558 (Ark. 1882).
39 Ark. 558 (St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Rapp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fernwood Mining Co. v. Pluna
205 S.W. 822 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1918)
Madison County v. Maples
103 Ark. 44 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Routh v. Thorpe
145 S.W. 888 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Crowe v. Corporation of Charles Town
57 S.E. 330 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1907)
Young v. United States
45 S.W. 115 (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1898)
Greene County ex rel. Baker v. Wilhite
35 Mo. App. 39 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)