St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Davenport
This text of 96 S.W. 994 (St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Davenport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs, S. A. Davenport and-W. L. Davenport, brought this action against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company and J. H. Reynolds, contractor, and Ben Reynolds, subcontractor, for alleged damages done to the plaintiffs’ farm lands in constructing the railroad through the same. Plaintiffs conveyed to the railroad a right of way over the land, and the damage is claimed to have been done to the remainder. The defendants filed a joint answer, denying that any damage had been done to the land. No separate defense was made by the railway company on the ground that the alleged damage was done by an independent contractor.
The case was submitted to the court sitting as a jury — no declarations of law were asked or given, and the court found for the plaintiffs, assessing damages at $85. Judgment was rendered accordingly against all of the defendants, and they appealed to this court.
We think there was evidence sufficient to sustain the finding of the court. The relations between the railway company and the contractors were not drawn out in the evidence, but it is shown that the damage was inflicted by those engaged in the construction of the railroad for the company, and it devolved upon the latter to show that the same was done by an independent contractor for whose conduct the company was not responsible.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 S.W. 994, 80 Ark. 244, 1906 Ark. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-iron-mountain-southern-railway-co-v-davenport-ark-1906.