St. Louis, I. M. & S. R'y Co. v. Jackson

3 Willson 394
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 9, 1887·No. No. 2618·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 327. Minor may sue by next friend, when. Elias Jackson, a minor, brought and prosecuted this suit by his next friend. Said minor had no guardian in this state, but had a mother and step-father residing in the state of Arkansas. Held: It is well settled that a minor who has no guardian may, in this state, maintain a suit by his next friend. (Hays v. Hays, 66 Tex. 606; R’y Co. v. Styron, id. 421.) The fact that Jackson had a natural guardian residing in another state did not deprive him of the right to maintain this suit by his next friend.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis, I. M. & S. R'y Co. v. Jackson, 3 Willson 394 (Tex. Ct. App. 1887).

3 Willson 394 (St. Louis, I. M. & S. R'y Co. v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hays v. Hays
1 S.W. 895 (Texas Supreme Court, 1886)