St. Louis Gas Light Co. v. City of St. Louis

84 Mo. 202
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1884·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Heney, C. J.

This is a branch of a litigation between these corporations, with which the courts have had ample opportunity to become familiar. The principles of law involved are so simple and well settled, that if the controversy involved but a few dollars, instead of a large sum, and was between two individuals, instead of two immense corporations, it would most probably never have been heard of either in the St. Louis court of appeals,' or this court. The opinion delivered in the cause by the court of appeals, satisfactorily disposes of every material question involved; and, while there are some utterances in the opinion to which we are not prepared either to give our assent or to express our dissent from, not deeming it necessary to a dispositipn of the cause, we are satisfied that the court of appeals reached a correct conclusion, and affirm its judgment.

All concur, except Sherwood,' J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis Gas Light Co. v. City of St. Louis, 84 Mo. 202 (Mo. 1884).

84 Mo. 202 (St. Louis Gas Light Co. v. City of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

School Consolidated District No. 10 v. Wilson
135 S.W.2d 349 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1939)
Meramec Spring Park Co. v. Gibson
188 S.W. 179 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1916)
Parker-Washington Co. v. Dennison
183 S.W. 1041 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1916)
West Missouri Land Co. v. Kansas City Suburban Belt Railroad
61 S.W. 847 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1901)
Brady & Kerby v. City of St. Joseph
84 Mo. App. 399 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1900)
Sanguinett v. Webster
54 S.W. 563 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)
Bradley v. Reppell
32 S.W. 645 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1896)