St. Louis County v. Glasgow Realty, LLC

210 S.W.3d 338, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1636, 2006 WL 3071237
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 31, 2006·No. No. ED 87820·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

St. Louis County, Missouri (County) appeals from the judgment dismissing the County’s petition against Glasgow Realty, LLC (Glasgow) based upon lack of compliance with Section 140.280, RSMo 2000. On appeal, the County argues that under the St. Louis County Charter (Charter) the trial court erred in granting Glasgow’s motion to dismiss because the St. Louis County Counselor (County Counselor) was the proper attorney to conduct a civil suit to collect the statutory penalty pursuant to Section 140.280, RSMo 2000. The County also argues the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment because the County established by uncontroverted facts that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis County v. Glasgow Realty, LLC, 210 S.W.3d 338, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1636, 2006 WL 3071237 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

210 S.W.3d 338 (St. Louis County v. Glasgow Realty, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.