St. Louis County v. Darrow

347 S.W.3d 165, 2011 WL 3808234
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 20, 2011·No. ED 95832·Published

Opinion

*166 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brett Darrow (Darrow) appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding him guilty of speeding, in violation of St. Louis County Revised Ordinance Nos. 1204.020. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential or precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis County v. Darrow, 347 S.W.3d 165, 2011 WL 3808234 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

347 S.W.3d 165 (St. Louis County v. Darrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.