St. Louis County v. B.A.P. Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

St. Louis County v. B.A.P. Inc.

14 S.W.3d 596, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 287, 1999 WL 152646

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in St. Louis County v. B.A.P. Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1259 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 9, 1999·No. No. 74164·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by information with promotion of obscene material, section 706.070 S.L.C.R.O. The trial court found defendant guilty and assessed punishment at a $1,000 fine. Defendant appeals the judgment on his conviction. We affirm.

[597]*597We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by information with promotion of obscene material, section 706.070 S.L.C.R.O. The trial court found defendant guilty and assessed punishment at a $1,000 fine. Defendant appeals the judgment on his conviction. We affirm.

[597]*597We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

St. Louis County v. B.A.P. Inc., 14 S.W.3d 596, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 287, 1999 WL 152646 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

14 S.W.3d 596 (St. Louis County v. B.A.P. Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.