St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Railroad v. Waggoner

Appellate Court of Illinois

St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Railroad v. Waggoner

53 Ill. App. 651

DecidedFebruary 15, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 53 Ill. App. 651 (St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Railroad v. Waggoner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Railroad v. Waggoner, 53 Ill. App. 651 (Ill. Ct. App. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scofield

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Except as to the amount of the verdict and judgment, the record in this case is- identical with the record in the case of the above named appellant against John B. Will, decided at the present term of this court. The abstracts and arguments and the questions involved, are the same in both cases. This case was to recover damages for the killing of the horse, and the Will case was to recover damages for the killing of the mule and the breaking of the wagon-tongue. We consider it unnecessary to re-state our reasons for sustaining the judgment of the court below, but we refer counsel and others interested to the opinion filed in the Will case as a sufficient presentation of our views of the questions argued and determined in this case. The judgment is afiirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Scofield

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Except as to the amount of the verdict and judgment, the record in this case is- identical with the record in the case of the above named appellant against John B. Will, decided at the present term of this court. The abstracts and arguments and the questions involved, are the same in both cases. This case was to recover damages for the killing of the horse, and the Will case was to recover damages for the killing of the mule and the breaking of the wagon-tongue. We consider it unnecessary to re-state our reasons for sustaining the judgment of the court below, but we refer counsel and others interested to the opinion filed in the Will case as a sufficient presentation of our views of the questions argued and determined in this case. The judgment is afiirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 Ill. App. 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-alton-terre-haute-railroad-v-waggoner-illappct-1894.