St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Railroad v. Goodall

43 Ill. App. 234, 1892 Ill. App. LEXIS 3
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 4, 1892·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record in this case contains no placita or convening order of court. It does not appear from anytliing in it before what judge the cause was tried or whether it was in fact heard before the judge who signs the bill of exceptions. It is not the office of the bill of exceptions to supply any part of the record proper. The judgment must be reversed. The reason why the judgment is not valid is because it does not appear that there was the proper organization of a court by which a lawful judgment could be rendered. Planing Mill Lumber Co. v. The City of Chicago, 56 Ill. 304; Keller v. Brickey, 63 Ill. 496.

The judgment is reversed and the canse remanded.

Peversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Railroad v. Goodall, 43 Ill. App. 234, 1892 Ill. App. LEXIS 3 (Ill. Ct. App. 1892).

43 Ill. App. 234 (St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Railroad v. Goodall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paul v. Weber
223 Ill. App. 257 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1921)
Leafgreen v. Leafgreen
127 Ill. App. 184 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1906)