St. Louis, Alton & Chicago Railroad v. Castello

28 Mo. 379
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMarch 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 Mo. 379 (St. Louis, Alton & Chicago Railroad v. Castello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. Louis, Alton & Chicago Railroad v. Castello, 28 Mo. 379 (Mo. 1859).

Opinion

NaptoN, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The liability of the sheriff to an action of replevin, under the circumstances of this case, is settled in the case of Bradley v. Holloway, 28 Mo. 150.

The exchange of bank notes for the convenience of bringing suit could not, of course, be regarded as a voluntary payment to the sheriff, or a waiver of claim on the part of the railroad company, and the understanding of the parties to it at the time of its occurrence having been submitted as a fact to be passed upon under proper instructions, there is no ground for disturbing the verdict and judgment. The other judges concurring, the* judgment of the court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Blanke v. Slayback
90 Mo. App. 300 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 Mo. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-louis-alton-chicago-railroad-v-castello-mo-1859.