St. Louis, Alton & Chicago Railroad v. Castello

28 Mo. 379
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided March 15, 1859·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

NaptoN, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The liability of the sheriff to an action of replevin, under the circumstances of this case, is settled in the case of Bradley v. Holloway, 28 Mo. 150.

The exchange of bank notes for the convenience of bringing suit could not, of course, be regarded as a voluntary payment to the sheriff, or a waiver of claim on the part of the railroad company, and the understanding of the parties to it at the time of its occurrence having been submitted as a fact to be passed upon under proper instructions, there is no ground for disturbing the verdict and judgment. The other judges concurring, the* judgment of the court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

St. Louis, Alton & Chicago Railroad v. Castello, 28 Mo. 379 (Mo. 1859).

28 Mo. 379 (St. Louis, Alton & Chicago Railroad v. Castello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Blanke v. Slayback
90 Mo. App. 300 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)