St. Lawrence State Hospital v. Fowler

Lewis County Court

St. Lawrence State Hospital v. Fowler

72 N.Y. St. Rep. 168

CourtNew York County Court, Lewis County

DecidedDecember 15, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 168 (St. Lawrence State Hospital v. Fowler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Court, Lewis County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. Lawrence State Hospital v. Fowler, 72 N.Y. St. Rep. 168 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

TURNER, J.

—The facts in this matter are the same as in the ( proceeding instituted by "the St. Lawrence State Hospital against [169]*169Fowler as the committee of Christian Holsworth, in the court of sessions in this county, to compel the committee to pay the sum of $3.75 per week to said hospital for the support and maintenance of John Holsworth, a pauper son of Christian Holsworth, at said state institution. The petitioner is the treasurer of said hospital, and the application herein is for an order directing the committee to pay to said hospital the sum of $245.29 for the care and maintenance of John Holsworth at said institution from .October 1, 1893, to the 1st day of January, 1895.

The committee, by his counsel, interposes these objections, to wit: (1) That the court has no ¡rower to bind either Christian Holsworth or his committee, Frederick Fowler, to the payment of his claim, as there is no evidence showing that any order has ever been obtained in the court of sessions requiring the said John Holsworth to be supported by his father, or by the committee of his father. (2) That until an order has been obtained in the court of sessions determing the liability of the father, and the amount thereof, for the support of the said John Holsworth, the county court has no jurisdiction to grant the order the petitioner herein requests, inasmuch as John Holsworth is not a minor, but is over twenty-one years of age. (3) That all the property of said Christian Holsworth, and all moneys and securities now in the hands of his said committee, are United States pension moneys, or derived wholly from a United States pension heretofore granted to the said Christain Holsworth.

After due consideration, it seems to me the objections in behalf of said Holsworth and his committee must b’e sustained. An order may be entered denying this application in behalf of St. Lawrence State.Hospital, but without costs.

Application denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TURNER, J.

—The facts in this matter are the same as in the ( proceeding instituted by "the St. Lawrence State Hospital against [169]*169Fowler as the committee of Christian Holsworth, in the court of sessions in this county, to compel the committee to pay the sum of $3.75 per week to said hospital for the support and maintenance of John Holsworth, a pauper son of Christian Holsworth, at said state institution. The petitioner is the treasurer of said hospital, and the application herein is for an order directing the committee to pay to said hospital the sum of $245.29 for the care and maintenance of John Holsworth at said institution from .October 1, 1893, to the 1st day of January, 1895.

The committee, by his counsel, interposes these objections, to wit: (1) That the court has no ¡rower to bind either Christian Holsworth or his committee, Frederick Fowler, to the payment of his claim, as there is no evidence showing that any order has ever been obtained in the court of sessions requiring the said John Holsworth to be supported by his father, or by the committee of his father. (2) That until an order has been obtained in the court of sessions determing the liability of the father, and the amount thereof, for the support of the said John Holsworth, the county court has no jurisdiction to grant the order the petitioner herein requests, inasmuch as John Holsworth is not a minor, but is over twenty-one years of age. (3) That all the property of said Christian Holsworth, and all moneys and securities now in the hands of his said committee, are United States pension moneys, or derived wholly from a United States pension heretofore granted to the said Christain Holsworth.

After due consideration, it seems to me the objections in behalf of said Holsworth and his committee must b’e sustained. An order may be entered denying this application in behalf of St. Lawrence State.Hospital, but without costs.

Application denied, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 N.Y. St. Rep. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-lawrence-state-hospital-v-fowler-nylewisctyct-1895.