St. Johns River Line Co. v. Doss

Supreme Court of Florida

St. Johns River Line Co. v. Doss

151 So. 710, 113 Fla. 377, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1770

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 28, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

St. Johns River Line Co. v. Doss, 151 So. 710, 113 Fla. 377, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1770 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

151 So. 710 (St. Johns River Line Co. v. Doss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.