St. John's Reg'l Health Ctr. v. Bartlett
This text of 2013 Ark. App. 614 (St. John's Reg'l Health Ctr. v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 614
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-13-487
ST. JOHN’S REGIONAL HEALTH Opinion Delivered October 30, 2013 CENTER and SISTERS OF MERCY HEALTH APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS APPELLANTS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION V. [NO. G202264]
GREGORY D. BARTLETT APPELLEE REBRIEFING ORDERED
ROBIN F. WYNNE, Judge
Appellee Gregory D. Bartlett worked for appellants as a paramedic when he injured
his right knee on the evening of January 4, 2012. The Commission found that Bartlett had
proved that he had sustained a compensable injury and that he was entitled to medical and
temporary total-disability benefits; the employer now appeals, arguing that substantial
evidence does not support the Commission’s decision. We cannot reach the merits of
appellants’ arguments because we must order rebriefing.
First, the addendum does not include appellee’s medical records, which are instead
abstracted. Rule 4-2(a)(8) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals
requires that the addendum include “any document essential to an understanding of the case
and the issues on appeal.” We hold that the medical records in a workers’ compensation case
in which compensability is at issue are essential to an understanding of the case and must be Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 614
included in the addendum. In addition, we note that the abstract is not in first person, as
required by Rule 4-2(a)(5)(B).
Appellants have fifteen days from the date of this order to file a substituted brief that
conforms with our rules. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3). We emphasize that the examples we
have noted are not to be taken as an exhaustive list of deficiencies; counsel should carefully
review the rules and ensure that no other deficiencies exist.
Rebriefing ordered.
GLOVER and VAUGHT, JJ., agree.
McAnany, Van Cleave & Phillips, P.C., by: Patricia L. Musick and Christopher S. Moberg,
for appellants.
Tolley & Brooks, P.A., by: Evelyn E. Brooks, for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 Ark. App. 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-johns-regl-health-ctr-v-bartlett-arkctapp-2013.