St. John's Episcopal Mission Center v. South Carolina Department of Social Services

280 S.E.2d 207, 276 S.C. 507, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 441
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 7, 1981
Docket21508
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 280 S.E.2d 207 (St. John's Episcopal Mission Center v. South Carolina Department of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. John's Episcopal Mission Center v. South Carolina Department of Social Services, 280 S.E.2d 207, 276 S.C. 507, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 441 (S.C. 1981).

Opinion

Lewis, Chief Justice":

This appeal is taken from a denial of a motion for change of venue. The parties hereto for some years engaged in a contractual arrangement whereby the respondent operated certain educational programs with funding and technical assistance to be provided by the appellant. The parties agreed expressly that, at the option of the appellant, venue would lie in Richland County in any actions arising from their contractual obligations.

A dispute between the parties did in fact arise and resulted in the commencement of this action by the respondent, as plaintiff, in the circuit court for Charleston County. The appellant’s motion for change of venue was denied below, and appeal has been taken therefrom.

By Statute, Section 15-7-50, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, parties may by consent agree to the hearing of actions in a county other than that in which it may otherwise have been brought. We have upheld such agreements in the past, and deem it proper to do' so where the circumstances make such agreement reasonable and not contrary to *509 public policy. Ex parte Pearson, 79 S. C. 302, 309, 60 S. E. 706; 17 C. J. S. Contracts § 229(2).

Accordingly we find these parties are bound by the terms of their agreement, and we reverse with instructions that this action be transferred from Charleston County to Rich-land County. In so ruling we need not reach the remaining issues raised on this appeal.

Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Consolidated Insured Benefits v. Conseco Medical Insurance Company
370 F. Supp. 2d 397 (D. South Carolina, 2004)
Atlantic Floor Services, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
334 F. Supp. 2d 875 (D. South Carolina, 2004)
Professional Ins. Corp. v. Sutherland
700 So. 2d 347 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1997)
Stanley Smith & Sons v. D.M.R. Inc.
415 S.E.2d 428 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1992)
High Life Sales Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp.
823 S.W.2d 493 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1992)
Manrique v. Fabbri
493 So. 2d 437 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
State Ex Rel. Marlo v. Hess
669 S.W.2d 291 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1984)
Zurich Ins. Co. v. Allen
436 So. 2d 1094 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 S.E.2d 207, 276 S.C. 507, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-johns-episcopal-mission-center-v-south-carolina-department-of-social-sc-1981.