St. John's Bank & Trust Co. v. Ryder

Missouri Court of Appeals

St. John's Bank & Trust Co. v. Ryder

712 S.W.2d 714, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 4261

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 17, 1986

DocketNo. 50714

StatusPublished

This text of 712 S.W.2d 714 (St. John's Bank & Trust Co. v. Ryder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. John's Bank & Trust Co. v. Ryder, 712 S.W.2d 714, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 4261 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Third-party defendant, Edwin C. Ryder, Jr., appeals from a judgment entered in favor of third-party plaintiff, Helen J. Ryder in her action for contribution. The judgment was entered after the trial court sustained Helen Ryder’s motion for directed verdict at the close of all the evidence during a jury trial. Edwin Ryder did not file a motion for new trial. He concedes that our review is limited to plain error. Rule 84.13(c); see e.g. McMahon v. Charles Schulze, Inc., 483 S.W.2d 666, 668 (Mo.App.1972). We may, in our discretion, review for plain error. O’Brien v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, 589 S.W.2d 629, 631 (Mo.App.1979). We have considered the record and the briefs and find that no manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice occurred. Rule 84.13(c).

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Third-party defendant, Edwin C. Ryder, Jr., appeals from a judgment entered in favor of third-party plaintiff, Helen J. Ryder in her action for contribution. The judgment was entered after the trial court sustained Helen Ryder’s motion for directed verdict at the close of all the evidence during a jury trial. Edwin Ryder did not file a motion for new trial. He concedes that our review is limited to plain error. Rule 84.13(c); see e.g. McMahon v. Charles Schulze, Inc., 483 S.W.2d 666, 668 (Mo.App.1972). We may, in our discretion, review for plain error. O’Brien v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, 589 S.W.2d 629, 631 (Mo.App.1979). We have considered the record and the briefs and find that no manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice occurred. Rule 84.13(c).

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

712 S.W.2d 714, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 4261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-johns-bank-trust-co-v-ryder-moctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack