St. John v. St. John

201 A.D.2d 552, 607 N.Y.S.2d 732
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 201 A.D.2d 552 (St. John v. St. John) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
St. John v. St. John, 201 A.D.2d 552, 607 N.Y.S.2d 732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust on real property, the plaintiff appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered November 16, 1990, which denied his motion, inter alia, for leave to enter a default judgment upon the defendant’s default in answering, and dismissed his complaint, inter alia, on the ground that there was a matrimonial action pending between the parties for the same relief, and (2) from an order of the same court, entered March 28, 1991, which denied the plaintiff’s motion for renewal.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We conclude that it was within the court’s discretion to deny the plaintiff’s motion for leave to enter a default judgment and to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint which sought, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust on the parties’ former marital residence. Given the pendency of a matrimonial action in which the plaintiff has, in fact, asked the matrimonial court to determine what constitutes marital property, fragmentation of the litigation would be duplicative [553]*553and counterproductive (see generally, Boronow v Boronow, 71 NY2d 284; Harrison v Harrison, 134 AD2d 567, 568). Any claim the plaintiff has regarding his former marital residence may be adjudicated in the pending matrimonial action.

We have considered the plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Ritter, J. P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swartz v. Swartz
2016 NY Slip Op 8390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Rossignol v. Rossignol
82 A.D.3d 1335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Liebert v. TIAA-CREF
34 A.D.3d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Raik v. Developers
282 A.D.2d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 A.D.2d 552, 607 N.Y.S.2d 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-john-v-st-john-nyappdiv-1994.