St. John v. Ridgetree Trails Homeowners Ass'n

Missouri Court of Appeals

St. John v. Ridgetree Trails Homeowners Ass'n

519 S.W.3d 464, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 163, 2017 WL 977247

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 14, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104352

StatusPublished

This text of 519 S.W.3d 464 (St. John v. Ridgetree Trails Homeowners Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

St. John v. Ridgetree Trails Homeowners Ass'n, 519 S.W.3d 464, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 163, 2017 WL 977247 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Greg St. John and Joan St. John (“Homeowners”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ridgetree Trails Homeowners Association, Doris Lahay, Brenda Wilson, Don [465]*465St. Julian, and Dave Jinkerson (collectively “the Association”) on Homeowners’ First Amended Petition for breach of contract, negligence and trespass, as well as the trial court’s grant of the Association’s motion to dismiss Homeowners’ nuisance claim. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Greg St. John and Joan St. John (“Homeowners”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ridgetree Trails Homeowners Association, Doris Lahay, Brenda Wilson, Don [465]*465St. Julian, and Dave Jinkerson (collectively “the Association”) on Homeowners’ First Amended Petition for breach of contract, negligence and trespass, as well as the trial court’s grant of the Association’s motion to dismiss Homeowners’ nuisance claim. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

519 S.W.3d 464, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 163, 2017 WL 977247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-john-v-ridgetree-trails-homeowners-assn-moctapp-2017.