St. John v. Olmsted
175 A.D. 964, 161 N.Y.S. 1144
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 175 A.D. 964 (St. John v. Olmsted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
St. John v. Olmsted, 175 A.D. 964, 161 N.Y.S. 1144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur[965]*965red, except Foote and Merrell, J.T., who dissented upon the ground that the evidence shows that the package, if left as alleged, was left by an independent contractor, for whose acts the defendant is not liable.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
175 A.D. 964, 161 N.Y.S. 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-john-v-olmsted-nyappdiv-1916.