St. John v. Buckley
This text of 56 N.Y.S. 635 (St. John v. Buckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This order may be sustained on the ground that the application for the examination of the defendant Whittaker is premature, as it appears that the plaintiff has information enough [636]*636on which to frame a complaint. But we think it clear that, after issue joined, the plaintiff will have the right to examine that defendant as to the whole transaction through which she acquired the judgment in controversy.
The order should be affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to an examination of the respondent Whittaker after issue joined.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 N.Y.S. 635, 39 A.D. 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/st-john-v-buckley-nyappdiv-1899.