St. John v. Buckley
56 N.Y.S. 635, 39 A.D. 629
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 1899·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
This order may be sustained on the ground that the application for the examination of the defendant Whittaker is premature, as it appears that the plaintiff has information enough [636] on which to frame a complaint. But we think it clear that, after issue joined, the plaintiff will have the right to examine that defendant as to the whole transaction through which she acquired the judgment in controversy.
The order should be affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to an examination of the respondent Whittaker after issue joined.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
St. John v. Buckley, 56 N.Y.S. 635, 39 A.D. 629 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).
56 N.Y.S. 635 (St. John v. Buckley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Punia v. Dry Dock Savings Bank
280 A.D. 431 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
Elmes v. Duke
39 Misc. 244 (New York Supreme Court, 1902)
Hutchinson v. Simpson
73 A.D. 520 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)